[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38872-38881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13975]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Technical Assistance and
Dissemination To Improve Services and Results for Children With
Disabilities and Demonstration and Training Programs--National
Technical Assistance Center on Transition for Students and Youth with
Disabilities
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for the National
Technical Assistance Center on Transition for Students with
Disabilities (Center), Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number 84.326E, to assist States in their work to improve outcomes for
students and youth with disabilities based on their particular needs.
To achieve this purpose, the Center will engage in partnerships with
parents, families, and diverse stakeholders and empower States to
pursue innovation. Further, the Center will be required to customize
its technical assistance (TA) to meet each State's specific, identified
needs. This notice relates to the approved information collection under
OMB control number 1820-0028.
DATES:
Applications Available: June 29, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Selete Avoke, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5002, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-7260. Email:
[email protected]. Or Kristen Rhinehart-Fernandez, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5094, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-6103. Email:
[email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Programs: The purpose of the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities program is to promote academic achievement and to improve
results for children with disabilities by providing TA, supporting
model demonstration projects, disseminating useful information, and
implementing activities that are supported by scientifically based
research.
The purpose of the Demonstration and Training program is to provide
competitive grants, including cooperative agreements, to, or enter into
contracts with, eligible entities to expand and improve the provision
of vocational rehabilitation (VR) and other services authorized under
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by title IV of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (Rehabilitation Act), or to
further the purposes and policies in sections 2(b) and (c) of the
Rehabilitation Act by supporting activities that increase the
provision, extent, availability, scope, and quality of rehabilitation
services under the Rehabilitation Act, including related research and
evaluation activities.
Priority: This notice includes one absolute priority. For the
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results
for Children with Disabilities program, in accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(v), the absolute priority is from allowable activities
specified in sections 663 and 681(d) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481(d)). For the
Demonstration and Training program, we are also establishing this
priority for the FY 2020 grant competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General
Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
National Technical Assistance Center on Transition for Students and
Youth with Disabilities (Center).
Background:
Students and youth with disabilities must be held to high
expectations and have the resources and supports needed to expand their
learning opportunities and prepare them for success in postsecondary
education or careers. This priority is aligned with the Secretary's
Final Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for Discretionary Grant
Programs (Supplemental Priorities) published in the Federal Register on
March 2, 2018 (83 FR 9096) and is designed to foster flexible and
affordable paths to obtaining knowledge and skills; foster knowledge
and promote the development of skills that prepare students to be
informed, thoughtful, and productive individuals and citizens; and meet
the unique needs of students and children with disabilities and those
with unique gifts and talents. This priority also is designed to
prepare students for successful transitions to college and careers by
improving access to career, technical, and adult education (CTE) and
exploring options, such as dual enrollment, that facilitate transition
from secondary school to postsecondary education and workforce job
skills development; to prepare students for high-quality science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education with a
particular focus on computer science; \1\ and provide students with
equal access to high-quality educational opportunities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ STEM is also a national priority. For more details, see
``Charting A Course For Success: America's Strategy For STEM
Education,'' www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf (December 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The IDEA and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as
amended (ESEA), provide States flexibility with the design of their
educational systems and other provisions to support and promote college
and career readiness for students, including those with disabilities
(English et al., 2016). Under ESEA, States need to ensure students
[[Page 38873]]
with disabilities, especially those with significant disabilities, are
not prevented from working toward a regular high school diploma that
allows them to pursue college and career opportunities (Thurlow et al.,
2016).
Similarly, the Rehabilitation Act emphasizes career readiness and
high-quality outcomes for students and youth with disabilities. With
the passage of WIOA, the differences in how education agencies and VR
agencies define and provide transition and pre-employment transition
services became more evident. For example, transition services are
available to eligible students and youth with disabilities under an
approved individualized plan for employment. Pre-employment transition
services are available to all students with disabilities who are
potentially eligible and eligible for VR services. As a result, State
educational agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies (LEAs), and
State VR agencies and their partners continue to examine their roles
and responsibilities and identify ways to ensure that transition
services and pre-employment transition services are coordinated in an
efficient and effective manner. Notwithstanding these requirements,
States need assistance in implementing these transition services.
The IDEA requires States to report data through their IDEA Part B
State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) on Indicator
13,\2\ which is the percentage of youth ages 16 and above with
individualized education programs (IEPs) that include appropriate
measurable postsecondary goals. The postsecondary goals are updated
annually and are based upon age-appropriate transition assessments
related to training, education, employment, and, where appropriate,
independent living skills. The IEP must also include transition
services (including courses of study) needed to assist the student in
reaching those postsecondary goals. States also must provide evidence
that each student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition
services were to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a
representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team
meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached
the age of majority. For Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2017-2018, only 11
out of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the 9 entities (the
freely associated States, the outlying areas, Puerto Rico, and the
Bureau of Indian Education) (18 percent) reported 100 percent
compliance with Indicator 13 requirements.\3\ As an IDEA requirement,
all States are expected to report 100 percent compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The IDEA Part B SPP/APR Indicator 13 is based on the
monitoring priority in 20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B). More information on
the indicator and other SPP/APR indicators can be found in the IDEA
Part B SPP/APR Indicator Measurement Table, at https://osep.grads360.org/#communities/pdc/documents/18303.
\3\ See https://osep.grads360.org/#program/spp-apr-resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, State VR agencies and their partners must meet
requirements established in the Rehabilitation Act for the provision of
services to students and youth with disabilities to ensure they have
opportunities to receive training and other services necessary to
achieve competitive integrated employment. More specifically, the
Rehabilitation Act, as amended by WIOA, expands both the population of
students with disabilities who may receive services and the kinds of
services that the VR agencies may provide to students and youth with
disabilities who are transitioning from school to postsecondary
education and employment. The Rehabilitation Act also increases
opportunities for students and youth with disabilities to practice and
improve workplace skills, such as through internships and other work-
based learning opportunities.
Under the Rehabilitation Act, State VR agencies are required to
reserve and expend not less than 15 percent of the Federal VR grant
award to provide, or arrange for the provision of, (a) pre-employment
transition services for students with disabilities transitioning from
school to postsecondary education programs and employment, and (b)
coordinate the provision of pre-employment transition services with
LEAs. These requirements have fostered significant increases in
communication and collaboration between State VR agencies and LEAs,
particularly regarding the provision of pre-employment transition
services for students with disabilities. However, even in States that
have a history of collaboration among SEAs, LEAs, and VR agencies, the
depth of collaboration required to define responsibilities and align
service implementation is a continuing challenge.
LEAs and schools, including charter schools, continue to need TA to
coordinate, implement, and provide pre-employment transition services
and IDEA transition services. According to the Case Service Report
(RSA-911),\4\ 173,709 students and youth with disabilities were
referred for VR services in program year (PY) 2018 (July 1, 2018--June
30, 2019). During this period, 61 percent were referred by educational
institutions, while 39 percent were referred by other referral sources
(e.g., self-referrals, family/friends, employers). As there were
413,353 students ages 14 to 21 who received services under IDEA in
school year 2016-17, the percentage of referrals from educational
institutions represents only a small fraction of those students with
disabilities who were potentially eligible or eligible for VR services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ RSA uses data collected through the Case Service Report
(RSA-911)(OMB control number 1820-0508) for the State VR Services
Program and the State Supported Employment (SE) Services Program to
describe the performance of the VR and SE programs in the Annual
Report to the Congress and the President as required by sections 13
and 101(a)(10) of the Rehabilitation Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As demonstrated by the data described above, there continues to be
a need for increased support to VR agencies and LEAs both in
identifying potentially eligible and eligible students for VR services
and providing those services. During PY 2018 alone,\5\ VR agencies
reported that 248,676 students with disabilities received pre-
employment transition services arranged for or provided by the VR
program. Of this number, 138,120 were students with disabilities
potentially eligible for VR services, and 110,556 were students with
disabilities who applied for VR services, were determined eligible, and
received pre-employment transition services. This data represents a
small fraction of the total number of potentially eligible students who
could benefit from pre-employment transition services. Not only could
more students with disabilities receiving special education services be
potentially eligible for pre-employment transition services, but also
an additional number of students who have disabilities as described in
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, could be
potentially eligible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ RSA-911.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department funds must be awarded and projects must be operated in a
manner consistent with nondiscrimination requirements contained in the
U.S. Constitution and Federal civil rights laws.
Priority
The purpose of this priority is to fund a cooperative agreement to
establish and operate a National Technical Assistance Center on
Transition for Students and Youth with Disabilities (Center). The
Center will assist SEAs, LEAs, State VR agencies, and other VR and
special education and related service providers to implement effective
practices and strategies that ensure that students and youth with
disabilities, including those
[[Page 38874]]
with significant disabilities, graduate from high school with the
knowledge, skills, and supports needed for postsecondary education,
training, and employment. In addition to in-person services, the Center
must offer appropriate remote environment methodologies for these
services in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Center must achieve, at
a minimum, the following expected outcomes:
(a) Improved development and implementation of, and compliance
with, interagency agreements between SEAs, LEAs, and State VR agencies.
These interagency agreements address data sharing, fiscal and
programmatic roles and responsibilities related to the provision of
pre-employment transition services, and transition services and other
VR services;
(b) Increased SEA and State VR agency capacity to provide TA and
professional development to LEAs and VR service providers to implement
pre-employment transition services that lead to post-secondary
education, training, and employment;
(c) Improved SEA, LEA, and State VR agency capacity to implement
with fidelity evidence-based transition services;
(d) Improved SEA, LEA, and State VR agency capacity to implement
career pathways including work-based learning experiences, internships,
and pre-apprenticeship and apprenticeship activities for students and
youth with disabilities, including those with the most significant
disabilities and those living in rural areas;
(e) Increased SEA, LEA, and State VR agency capacity and
collaboration to improve students with disabilities' access to, and
participation in, CTE that leads to occupations that require licenses
or certification;
(f) Increased use of data sharing agreements \6\ among SEAs, LEAs,
State VR agencies, and other VR service providers to inform and improve
the provision of services for students with disabilities;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Applicants must ensure the confidentiality of individual
student data, consistent with the Confidentiality of Information
regulations under both part B and part C of IDEA, which incorporate
requirements and exceptions under section 444 of the General
Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g), commonly known as the
``Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act'' (FERPA), but also
include several provisions that are specifically related to children
with disabilities receiving services under IDEA and provide
protections beyond the FERPA regulations. Therefore, examining the
IDEA requirements first is the most effective and efficient way to
meet the requirements of both IDEA and FERPA for children with
disabilities. Applicants should also be aware of State laws or
regulations concerning the confidentiality of individual records.
See www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/ptac/pdf/idea-ferpa.pdf and
studentprivacy.ed.gov/resources/ferpaidea-cross-walk. Final FERPA
regulatory changes became effective January 3, 2012, and include
requirements for data sharing. Applicants are encouraged to review
the final FERPA regulations published on December 2, 2011 (76 FR
75604). Questions can be directed to the Student Privacy Policy
Office (www.ed.gov/fpco) at (202) 260-3887 or [email protected].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) Increased capacity of SEAs, LEAs, and State VR agencies to
collect and evaluate data on the effectiveness of services for students
and youth with disabilities;
(h) Increased capacity of States to design and implement a State-
designed alternative diploma where appropriate;
(i) Increased implementation of effective dropout prevention models
and practices to increase school completion and graduation;
(j) Increased implementation of transition services and pre-
employment transition services within a multi-tiered systems of support
(MTSS) framework (i.e., how schools can implement the predictors and
practices for post-school outcomes in an MTSS framework);
(k) Increased implementation of transition services and pre-
employment transition services for high-risk students with disabilities
(e.g., students with the most significant disabilities, students in
foster care, military-connected students and youth, youth involved with
the juvenile justice system, and youth who are homeless or using or
abusing controlled substances); and
(l) Improved referral and application processes that facilitate
parental involvement and consent for the provision of services.
In addition to applicants achieving the expected outcomes described
above, to be considered for funding under the absolute priority,
applicants must also meet the following application and administrative
requirements, which are:
(a) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Significance of the project,'' how the proposed project will--
(1) Address training and information needs, gaps or weaknesses of
SEAs, LEAs, State VR agencies, and other VR service providers,
including those located in rural areas, to implement practices and
strategies that will promote collaboration among agency personnel,
prevent students with disabilities from dropping out of school, and
facilitate the transition from secondary school to college and careers.
To meet this requirement, the applicant must--
(i) Demonstrate knowledge of new and emerging issues and TA needs
related to pre-employment transition services, transition services,
other VR services, CTE, vocational education and training, dropout
prevention, secondary transition, apprenticeship, and college and
careers;
(ii) Demonstrate knowledge of exemplary transition activities,
including pre-employment transition services, and career pathway models
that will assist SEAs, LEAs, State VR agencies, and other VR service
providers, in improving post-school outcomes for students with
disabilities;
(iii) Demonstrate knowledge of current State VR agency and other
efforts to improve engagement with secondary schools, charter schools,
youth programs, and other programs that provide services to youth with
disabilities for the purpose of assisting such youth to enter
postsecondary education or competitive integrated employment; and
(iv) Present applicable national and State data demonstrating the
training needs of SEAs, LEAs, State VR agencies, and other VR service
providers to implement exemplary practices and strategies that will
reduce high- school dropout rates and facilitate the transition to
college and careers for students with disabilities;
(2) Demonstrate knowledge of high-risk populations including
students with the most significant disabilities, students in foster
care, military-connected students and youth, youth involved with the
juvenile justice system, and youth who are homeless or using or abusing
controlled substances; and
(3) Demonstrate knowledge of effective means to improve
communication and engagement among students in public and nonpublic
schools, parents, families, education professionals, employers, and
SEA, LEA, and VR personnel to enhance collaboration and improve the
post-school outcomes of students with disabilities.
(b) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Quality of the project services,'' how the proposed project will--
(1) Ensure equal access and treatment for members of groups that
have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
To meet this requirement, the applicant must describe how it will--
(i) Identify the needs of the intended recipients for TA and
information; and
(ii) Ensure that services and products meet the needs of the
intended recipients of the grant;
(2) Achieve its goals, objectives, and intended outcomes. To meet
this
[[Page 38875]]
requirement, the applicant must provide--
(i) A plan for how the Center proposes to communicate, collaborate,
and coordinate, on an ongoing basis with Parent Training and
Information (PTI) centers funded under sections 671 and 681(d) of IDEA
and the PTI centers and a national Center funded under section 303(c)
of the Rehabilitation Act, as well as other Department-funded projects
and those supported by other Federal agencies, including those funded
by the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on
Community Living, as appropriate, and a description of how the Center
will evaluate the effectiveness of its coordination and collaboration;
(ii) Measurable intended project outcomes; and
(iii) In Appendix A, the logic model \7\ by which the proposed
project will achieve its intended outcomes that depicts, at a minimum,
the goals and how they will be measured, activities, outputs, and
intended project outcomes of the proposed project;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ ``Logic model'' (also referred to as a theory of action)
means a framework that identifies key project components of the
proposed project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are
hypothesized to be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and
describes the theoretical and operational relationships among the
key project components and relevant outcomes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Use a conceptual framework (and provide a copy in Appendix A)
to develop project plans and activities, describing any underlying
concepts, assumptions, expectations, beliefs, or theories, as well as
the presumed relationships or linkages among these variables, and any
empirical support for this framework;
Note: The following websites provide more information on logic
models and conceptual frameworks: www.osepideasthatwork.org/logicModel
and www.osepideasthatwork.org/resources-grantees/program-areas/ta-ta/tad-project-logic-model-and-conceptual-framework;
(4) Be based on current research on the most effective ways to
prepare students with disabilities to participate in transition
services, pre-employment transition services, other VR services,
college, CTE, vocational education, and careers. To meet this
requirement, the applicant must describe--
(i) The current research on the most effective ways to prepare
students with disabilities for successful post-school outcomes;
(ii) The current research about adult learning principles and
implementation science that will inform the proposed TA (section
101(a)(11)(D) of the Rehabilitation Act); and
(iii) How the proposed project will incorporate current research
and practices in the development and delivery of its products and
services (section 101(a)(11)(D) of the Rehabilitation Act);
(5) Develop new products or refine or update publicly available
existing products and provide services that are of high quality and
sufficient intensity and duration to achieve the intended outcomes of
the proposed project (sections 103(a) and 113(d)(3) of the
Rehabilitation Act). To address this requirement, the applicant must
describe--
(i) How it proposes to identify or develop the knowledge base on
supporting students with disabilities to stay in school, receive
effective transition services, pre-employment transition services and
VR services, CTE, and vocational education, and to be prepared for
college and careers, including in STEM fields;
(ii) Its proposed approach to universal, general TA,\8\ which must
identify the intended recipients, including the type and number of
recipients, that will receive the products and services, a description
of new or existing publicly available products that may be used and
services that the Center proposes to make available, and the expected
impact of those products and services under this approach; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Universal, general TA'' means TA and information provided
to independent users through their own initiative, resulting in
minimal interaction with TA center staff and including one-time,
invited or offered conference presentations by TA center staff. This
category of TA also includes information or products, such as
newsletters, guidebooks, or research syntheses, downloaded from the
TA center's website by independent users. Brief communications by TA
center staff with recipients, either by telephone or email, are also
considered universal, general TA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) Its proposed approach to targeted, specialized TA,\9\ which
must identify--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ ``Targeted, specialized TA'' means TA services based on
needs common to multiple recipients and not extensively
individualized. A relationship is established between the TA
recipient and one or more TA center staff. This category of TA
includes one-time, labor-intensive events, such as facilitating
strategic planning or hosting regional or national conferences. It
can also include episodic, less labor-intensive events that extend
over a period of time, such as facilitating a series of conference
calls on single or multiple topics that are designed around the
needs of the recipients. Facilitating communities of practice can
also be considered targeted, specialized TA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) The intended recipients, including the type and number of
recipients, that will receive the products and services, a description
of new or existing publicly available products that may be used and
services that the Center proposes to make available, and the expected
impact of those products and services under this approach; and
(B) Its proposed approach to measure readiness of potential TA
recipients to work with the project, assessing, at a minimum, their
current infrastructure, available resources, and ability to build
capacity at the local level; and
(iv) Its proposed approach to intensive, sustained TA,\10\ which
must identify--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ ``Intensive, sustained TA'' means TA services often
provided on-site and requiring a stable, ongoing relationship
between the TA center staff and the TA recipient. ``TA services''
are defined as negotiated series of activities designed to reach a
valued outcome. This category of TA should result in changes to
policy, program, practice, or operations that support increased
recipient capacity or improved outcomes at one or more systems
levels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) The intended recipients, including the type and number of
recipients, that will receive the products and services, a description
of new or existing publicly available products that may be used and
services that the Center proposes to make available, and the expected
impact of those products and services under this approach;
(B) Its proposed approach to measure the readiness of SEAs, LEAs,
State VR agencies, and other VR service providers to work with the
project, including their commitment to the initiative, alignment of the
initiative to their needs, and ability to build capacity, and implement
and sustain TA at the local, district, or State level);
(C) Its proposed plan for assisting SEAs, LEAs, State VR agencies,
and other VR service providers to build and sustain training systems
that include professional development based on adult learning
principles and coaching; and
(D) Its proposed plan for working with appropriate levels of the
education and VR system (e.g., SEAs, LEAs State VR agencies, VR service
providers, CTE and vocational education charter schools, private
industry, employers, Health and Human Services personnel, Department of
Labor personnel, dropout prevention specialists, transition-related
professionals, postsecondary education professionals, regional TA
providers, parents and families) to ensure that there is communication
between each level and that there are systems in place to support the
use of effective transition practices from school to college and
careers.
(6) Develop products and implement services that maximize
efficiency. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe--
(i) How the proposed project will use technology to achieve the
intended project outcomes;
[[Page 38876]]
(ii) With whom the proposed project will collaborate and the
intended outcomes of this collaboration; and
(iii) How the proposed project will use non-project resources to
achieve the intended project outcomes; and
(7) Develop a dissemination plan that describes how the applicant
will systematically distribute information, products, and services to
varied intended audiences, using a variety of dissemination strategies,
to promote awareness and use of the Center's products and services.
(c) In the narrative section of the application under ``Quality of
the project evaluation,'' include an evaluation plan for the project as
described in the following paragraphs. The evaluation plan must
describe: measures of progress in implementation, including the
criteria for determining the extent to which the project's products and
services have met the goals for reaching its target population;
measures of intended outcomes or results of the project's activities in
order to evaluate those activities; and how well the goals or
objectives of the proposed project, as described in its logic model,
have been met. The applicant also must include a proposed plan for
collecting baseline, targeted, and outcome data for each intensive TA
site.
The applicant must provide an assurance that, in designing the
evaluation plan, it will--
(1) Designate, with the approval of the OSEP and RSA project
officers, a project liaison with sufficient dedicated time, experience
in evaluation, and knowledge of the project to work in collaboration
with the Center to Improve Program and Project Performance (CIPP),\11\
the project director, and the OSEP project officer on the following
tasks:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The major tasks of CIPP are to guide, coordinate, and
oversee the design of formative evaluations for every large
discretionary investment (i.e., those awarded $500,000 or more per
year and required to participate in the 3+2 process) in OSEP's
Technical Assistance and Dissemination; Personnel Development;
Parent Training and Information Centers; and Educational Technology,
Media, and Materials programs. The efforts of CIPP are expected to
enhance individual project evaluation plans by providing expert and
unbiased TA in designing the evaluations with due consideration of
the project's budget. CIPP does not function as a third-party
evaluator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Revise the logic model submitted in the application to provide
for a more comprehensive measurement of implementation and outcomes and
to reflect any changes or clarifications to the model discussed at the
kick-off meeting;
(ii) Refine the evaluation design and instrumentation proposed in
the application consistent with the revised logic model and using the
most rigorous design suitable (e.g., prepare evaluation questions about
significant program processes and outcomes; develop quantitative or
qualitative data collections that permit both the collection of
progress data, including fidelity of implementation, as appropriate,
and the assessment of project outcomes; and identify analytic
strategies); and
(iii) Revise the evaluation plan submitted in the application such
that it clearly--
(A) Specifies the evaluation questions, measures, and associated
instruments or sources for data appropriate to answer these questions,
suggests analytic strategies for those data, provides a timeline for
conducting the evaluation, and includes staff assignments for
completing the evaluation activities;
(B) Delineates the data expected to be available by the end of the
second project year for use during the project's evaluation (3+2
review) for continued funding described under the heading Fourth and
Fifth Years of the Project; and
(C) Can be used to assist the project director and the OSEP and RSA
project officers, with the assistance of CIPP, as needed, to specify
the project performance measures to be addressed in the project's
annual performance report;
(2) Dedicate sufficient staff time and other resources during the
first six months of the project to cooperate with CIPP staff, including
regular meetings (e.g., weekly, biweekly, or monthly) with CIPP and the
OSEP and RSA project officers, in order to accomplish the tasks
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and
(3) Dedicate sufficient funds in each budget year to cover the
costs of carrying out the tasks described in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2)
of this section and revising and implementing the evaluation plan.
Please note in your budget narrative the funds dedicated for this
activity.
(d) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Adequacy of project resources,'' how--
(1) The proposed project will encourage applications for employment
from persons who are members of groups that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or
disability, as appropriate;
(2) The proposed key project personnel, consultants, and
subcontractors have the qualifications and experience, including
knowledge of VR, to carry out the proposed activities and achieve the
project's intended outcomes;
(3) The applicant and any key partners have adequate resources to
carry out the proposed activities; and
(4) The proposed costs are reasonable in relation to the
anticipated results and benefits.
(e) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Quality of the management plan,'' how--
(1) The proposed management plan will ensure that the project's
intended outcomes will be achieved on time and within budget. To
address this requirement, the applicant must describe--
(i) Clearly defined responsibilities for key project personnel,
partners, subject matter experts, and contractors, as applicable; and
(ii) Timelines and milestones for accomplishing the project tasks;
(2) Key project personnel and any consultants and subcontractors
will be allocated and how these allocations are appropriate and
adequate to achieve the project's intended outcomes;
(3) The proposed management plan will ensure that the products and
services provided are of high quality, relevant, and useful to
recipients; and
(4) The proposed project will benefit from a diversity of
perspectives, including those of parents and families, educators in
public and nonpublic schools, TA providers, researchers, and policy
makers, among others, in its development and operation.
(f) Address the following application requirements. The applicant
must--
(1) Include, in Appendix A, personnel-loading charts and timelines,
as applicable, to illustrate the management plan described in the
narrative;
(2) Include, in the budget, attendance at the following:
(i) A two-day kick-off meeting in Washington, DC, after receipt of
the award, and an annual planning meeting, with the OSEP and RSA
project officers and other relevant staff during each subsequent year
of the project period.
Note: Within 30 days of receipt of the award, a post-award
teleconference must be held between the OSEP and RSA project officers
and the grantee's project director or other authorized representative;
(ii) A two and one-half day OSEP project directors' conference in
Washington, DC, during each year of the project period;
(iii) Three annual two-day trips to attend Department briefings,
Department-sponsored conferences, and other meetings, as requested by
OSEP and RSA; and
[[Page 38877]]
(iv) A two-day intensive 3+2 review meeting during the second year
of the project period;
(3) Include, in the budget, a line item for an annual set-aside of
five percent of OSEP's portion of the grant amount to support emerging
needs that are consistent with the proposed project's intended
outcomes, as those needs are identified in consultation with, and
approved by, the OSEP project officer. With approval from the OSEP
project officer, the project must reallocate any remaining funds from
this annual set-aside no later than the end of the third quarter of
each budget period;
(4) Maintain a high-quality website, with an easy-to-navigate
design, that meets government or industry-recognized standards for
accessibility including section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. In
meeting this requirement, applicants may develop new platforms or
systems or may modify existing platforms or systems, so long as the
requirements of this priority are met;
(5) Ensure that annual progress toward meeting project goals is
posted on the project website;
(6) Disseminate grant products, information about targeted and
universal TA activities, such as webinars and other relevant
information, to a wide audience, as well as RSA's National
Clearinghouse of Rehabilitation Training Materials (NCRTM) at
www.ncrtm.ed.gov. The NCRTM is RSA's central repository for maintaining
and sharing training and TA materials for the VR community; and
(7) Include, in Appendix A, two assurances. The first assurance is
to assist OSEP and RSA with the transfer of pertinent resources and
products and to maintain the continuity of services to TA recipients
during the transition to this new award period and at the end of this
award period, as appropriate. The second assurance is to ensure the
applicant will track and report IDEA and Rehabilitation Act funds
separately. Please refer to the Funding Restrictions section of the
notice for more information about preparing the budget.
Fourth and Fifth Years of the Project:
In deciding whether to continue funding the project for the fourth
and fifth years, the Secretary will consider the requirements of 34 CFR
75.253(a), as well as--
(a) The recommendation of a 3+2 review team consisting of experts
selected by the Secretary. This review will be conducted during a two-
day intensive meeting that will be held during the last half of the
second year of the project period;
(b) The timeliness with which, and how well, the requirements of
the negotiated cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the
project; and
(c) The quality, relevance, and usefulness of the project's
products and services and the extent to which the project's products
and services are aligned with the project's objectives and likely to
result in the project achieving its intended outcomes.
References:
English, D., Rasmussen, J., Cushing, E., & Therriault, S. (2016).
Leveraging Every Student Succeeds Act to support state visions for
college and career readiness. College and Career Readiness and
Success Center. https://ccrscenter.org/sites/default/files/AskCCRS_LeveragingESSA.pdf.
Thurlow, M., Test, D., Lazarus, S., Klare, M., & Fowler, C. (2016).
Considerations for developing state-defined alternate diplomas for
students with significant cognitive disabilities. University of
Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes; and University
of North Carolina Charlotte, National Technical Assistance Center on
Transition.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested
parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities. Under the
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results
for Children with Disabilities program, section 681(d) of IDEA makes
the public comment requirements of the APA inapplicable to the priority
in this notice. Under the Demonstration and Training program, section
437(d)(1) of GEPA allows the Secretary to exempt from rulemaking
requirements regulations governing the first grant competition under a
new or substantially revised program authority. This is the first grant
competition for this program under section 29 U.S.C. 773(b)(5)(A) of
the Rehabilitation Act and therefore qualifies for this exemption. In
order to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forgo
public comment on the priority under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. This
priority will apply to the FY 2020 grant competition and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition.
Program Authorities: 20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
773(b).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)
in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the
Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the
Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The following definitions from 34
CFR part 361 apply: (1) ``transition services'' (34 CFR 361.5(c)(55));
(2) ``pre-employment transition services'' (34 CFR 361.5(c)(42) and
361.48(a)); (3) ``VR services'' (34 CFR 361.48(b)); (4) ``student with
a disability'' (34 CFR 361.5(c)(51)); (5) ``youth with disability'' (34
CFR 361.5(c)(58)); (6) ``competitive integrated employment'' (34 CFR
361.5(c)(9)); (7) ``supported employment'' (34 CFR 361.5(c)(53)); and
(8) ``customized employment'' (34 CFR 361.5(c)(11)). (e) The
regulations in 34 CFR part 373 (Rehabilitation National Activities
Program). (f) The regulations in 48 CFR part 31 (Contract Cost
Principles and Procedures).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian Tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education (IHEs) only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative agreement.
Estimated Available Funds: $4,100,000
Rehabilitation Act funds: $2,000,000.
IDEA funds: $2,100,000.
Note: Applicants must address regulations outlining funding
restrictions referenced in the Applicable Regulations section of this
notice, in Part III Eligibility Determination, and in Part IV
Application Submission Information of this notice. Applicants must
submit an ED-524 budget form and include a budget narrative in the
application specific to IDEA funding. Applicants must also submit an
ED-524 budget form and include a budget narrative in the application
specific to Rehabilitation Act funding.
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $4,100,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs; LEAs, including public charter
schools that operate as LEAs under State law; IHEs; other public
agencies; private nonprofit
[[Page 38878]]
organizations; freely associated States and outlying areas; Indian
Tribes or Tribal organizations; and for-profit organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: There is no requirement for cost
sharing or matching.
3. Subgrantees: Under 34 CFR 373.23(b), a grantee may not make a
subgrant under the Rehabilitation National Activities Program. However,
a grantee may contract for supplies, equipment, and other services, in
accordance with 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements,
Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards) as adopted
at 2 CFR part 3474. Therefore, the grantee may not use Rehabilitation
Act funds to award subgrants. Under 34 CFR 75.708(b) and (c), a grantee
under this competition may award subgrants using IDEA funds to directly
carry out project activities described in its application and
authorized under the IDEA to the following types of entities: IHEs and
private nonprofit organizations suitable to carry out the activities
proposed in the application and authorized under the IDEA. The grantee
may award subgrants using IDEA funds to entities it has identified in
an approved application.
4. Other General Requirements:
(a) Recipients of funding under this competition must make positive
efforts to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with
disabilities (see section 606 of IDEA; 20 U.S.C. 1405).
(b) Applicants for, and recipients of, funding must, with respect
to the aspects of their proposed project relating to the absolute
priority, involve individuals with disabilities, or parents of
individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26, in planning,
implementing, and evaluating the project (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of
IDEA; 20 U.S.C. 1482).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3678) and available at www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which contain
requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for the National
Technical Assistance Center on Transition for Students and Youth with
Disabilities your application may include business information that you
consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information''
and describe the process we use in determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended). Because we plan to make successful applications available to
the public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information. Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in
your application any information that you believe is exempt from
disclosure under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of
your application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the
page number or numbers on which we can find this information. For
additional information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. However,
under 34 CFR 79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental review in order to
make an award by the end of FY 2020.
4. Funding Restrictions: Regulations outlining funding restrictions
are referenced in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
Under 34 CFR 373.23(b), the grantee is not permitted to subgrant
using Rehabilitation Act funds.
Under 34 CFR 373.22(a), indirect cost reimbursement for grants
under the Rehabilitation National Activities program is limited to the
recipient's actual indirect costs, as determined by its negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement, or 10 percent of the total direct cost
base, whichever amount is less. This requirement only applies to the
Rehabilitation Act funds. Eligible entities can apply their negotiated
indirect cost rate for the IDEA funds.
Under 34 CFR 373.22(c), the 10 percent limit on indirect cost
reimbursement for the Rehabilitation Act funds does not apply to
federally recognized Indian Tribal governments and their Tribal
representatives.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 75.210 and are as follows:
(a) Significance (10 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
(ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely
to be attained by the proposed project.
(b) Quality of project services (35 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be
provided by the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the quality and
sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(ii) The extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying
the proposed research or demonstration activities and the quality of
that framework.
(iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the
proposed project reflect up-to-date knowledge from research and
effective practice.
(iv) The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient
quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice
among the recipients of those services.
(v) The extent to which the TA services to be provided by the
proposed project involve the use of efficient strategies, including the
use of technology, as appropriate, and the leveraging of non-project
resources.
(vi) The adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products
and services from the proposed project.
(c) Quality of the project evaluation (20 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project.
(ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide for
examining the
[[Page 38879]]
effectiveness of project implementation strategies.
(iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes.
(iv) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible.
(d) Adequacy of resources and quality of project personnel (15
points).
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the
proposed project and the quality of the personnel who will carry out
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of the project director or principal investigator.
(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of key project personnel.
(iii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of project consultants or subcontractors.
(iv) The qualifications, including relevant training, experience,
and independence, of the evaluator.
(v) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment,
supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the
lead applicant organization.
(vi) The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in
the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.
(vii) The extent to which the budget is adequate to support the
proposed project.
(viii) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to
the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed
project.
(e) Quality of the management plan (20 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
(ii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project.
(iii) The adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products
and services from the proposed project.
(iv) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives
are brought to bear in the operation of the proposed project, including
those of parents, teachers, the business community, a variety of
disciplinary and professional fields, recipients or beneficiaries of
services, or others, as appropriate.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Additional Review and Selection Process Factors: In the past,
the Department has had difficulty finding peer reviewers for certain
competitions because so many individuals who are eligible to serve as
peer reviewers have conflicts of interest. The standing panel
requirements under section 682(b) of IDEA also have placed additional
constraints on the availability of reviewers. Therefore, the Department
has determined that for some discretionary grant competitions,
applications may be separated into two or more groups and ranked and
selected for funding within specific groups. This procedure will make
it easier for the Department to find peer reviewers by ensuring that
greater numbers of individuals who are eligible to serve as reviewers
for any particular group of applicants will not have conflicts of
interest. It also will increase the quality, independence, and fairness
of the review process, while permitting panel members to review
applications under discretionary grant competitions for which they also
have submitted applications.
4. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
5. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic
[[Page 38880]]
version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance Results
Modernization Act of 2010, the Department has established a set of
performance measures, including long-term measures, that are designed
to yield information on various aspects of the effectiveness and
quality of the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve
Services and Results for Children With Disabilities program. These
measures are:
Program Performance Measure 1: The percentage of Technical
Assistance and Dissemination products and services deemed to be of high
quality by an independent review panel of experts qualified to review
the substantive content of the products and services.
Program Performance Measure 2: The percentage of Special
Education Technical Assistance and Dissemination products and services
deemed by an independent review panel of qualified experts to be of
high relevance to educational and early intervention policy or
practice.
Program Performance Measure 3: The percentage of all
Special Education Technical Assistance and Dissemination products and
services deemed by an independent review panel of qualified experts to
be useful in improving educational or early intervention policy or
practice, including the preparation of students with disabilities for
postsecondary education and employment.
Program Performance Measure 4: The cost efficiency of the
Technical Assistance and Dissemination Program includes the percentage
of milestones achieved in the current annual performance report period
and the percentage of funds spent during the current fiscal year.
Program Performance Measure 5: For recipients of intensive
TA, increase the number and quality of signed and executed formal
interagency agreements among SEAs, LEAs, and State VR agencies that
comply with the requirements in 34 CFR 361.22(b).
Long-term Program Performance Measure: The percentage of
States receiving Special Education Technical Assistance and
Dissemination services regarding scientifically or evidence-based
practices for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities
that successfully promote the implementation of those practices in
school districts and service agencies.
Applicants must also report the following for recipients of
intensive and targeted TA: (a) Relevant data that substantiates
increased provision of job exploration counseling, work-based learning
experiences, counseling on enrollment opportunities in comprehensive
transition or postsecondary educational programs at IHEs, workplace
readiness training, and instruction in self-advocacy through
collaboration among State VR agencies and their service providers,
SEAs, LEAs, and other workforce development partners, as appropriate;
and (b) percentage of intensive TA sites that can attribute increases
in competitive integrated employment, supported employment and
customized employment, or other relevant measures, as appropriate, to
the TA provided by the Center.
The measures apply to projects funded under this competition, and
grantees are required to submit data on these measures as directed by
OSEP and RSA.
Grantees will be required to report information on their project's
performance in annual and final performance reports to the Department
(34 CFR 75.590).
The Department will also closely monitor the extent to which the
products and services provided by the Center meet needs identified by
stakeholders and may require the Center to report on such alignment in
their annual and final performance reports.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal
[[Page 38881]]
Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site
you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this
Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable
Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration. Delegated the
authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services.
[FR Doc. 2020-13975 Filed 6-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P